V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, R. B. MISRA, P. N. BHAGWATI, O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY
R. Viswan: Nirmal Chhibbar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J. :- These writ petitions raise a short but interesting question of law relating to the intepretation of Article 33 of the Constitution. The question is whether Section 21 of the Army Act 1950 read with Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article 33 and if it is, whether Central Government Notifications Nos. SRO 329 and 330 dated 23rd September 1960 making inter alia Sec. 21 of the Army Act. 1950 and Chapter IV of the Army Rules 1954, applicable to the General Reserve Engineering Force are ultra vires that Article since the General Reserve Engineering Force is neither an Armed Force nor a Force charged with the maintenance of public order, It is a question of some importance since it affects the fundamental rights of a large number of persons belonging to the General Reserve Engineering Force and in order to arrive at a correct decision of this question, it is necessary first of all to consider the true nature and character of the General Reserve Engineering Force.
2. In or about 1960 it was felt that economic development of the North and North Eastern Border areas were greatly handicapped by meagre and inadequate communications and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.