G.N.RAY, P.B.SAWANT
Shamkant Narayan Deshpande – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SAWANT, J.:—The petitioner is a diploma-holder in Engineering and holds the post of Executive Engineer in the respondent-Corporation. Till 1974, the promotional post of the Superintending Engineer was available both for diploma-holders and degree-holders according to merit-cum-seniority. This was so according to the practice followed by the Corporation without making any rules or regulations in that behalf. In 1974, the Corporation made regulations by passing a resolution and continued the same practice. Admittedly, the regulations were not made under Section 64 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) under which the respondent-Corporation was created. Thereafter in 1988, the Corporation passed a resolution, for the first time, making 75 per cent of the posts of Superintending Engineers available to the Executive Engineers holding degrees and 25 per cent to the Executive Engineers who were diploma-holders. This resolution was also admittedly not a regulation made under the said Section 64. But for this resolution, the petitioner who was senior to respondent No. 2 would have been promoted to the post of Superintending Enginee
relied on : State of J and K v. Triloki Nath Khosa
State of Mysore v. P. Narasing Rao
Union of India v. Dr (Mrs) S.B. Kohli
distinguished : Roshan Lal Tandon v. Union of India
Mervyn Coutinho v. Collector of Customs, Bombay
S.M. Pandit v. State of Gujarat
held per incuriam : H.C. Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
relied on : Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Gopinath Gundachar Char
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.