B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN, SUHAS C.SEN
Goodricks Group LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.- The validity of the levy of education cess and rural employment cess created by the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989 is called in question in these writ petitions preferred by several tea estates in West Bengal.
Legislative background
2. For a proper appreciation of the questions arising herein, it is necessary to have a glimpse of the legislative history behind the impugned Amendment Act. The West Bengal Legislature enacted the West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 and the West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976 to provide for primary education throughout the State and to provide employment in rural areas respectively. For raising funds for the said purposes, the State Legislature imposed two cesses upon certain lands and buildings in the State. Since the relevant provisions of both the enactments are similar, it would be sufficient to notice the relevant provisions of the West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976. Section 4(1) of the 1976 Act levies rural employment cess on all immovable properties on which road or public work cess is assessed or liable to be assessed according to the provisions of th
relied on : Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee v. Local Board of Barpeta
Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Nair v. State ofKerala
Asstt. Commr. of Urban Land Tax v. Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd.
Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Assn. v. Union of India
State ofA. P. v. Nalla Raja Reddy
approved : India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N.
distinguished : Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee v. Local Board of Barpeta
referred to : Express Hotels (P) Ltd. v. State of Gujarat
orissa Cement Lid. v. State of orissa
Sainik Motors v. State of Rajasthan
State of Madras v. Cannon Dunkerley and Co.
distinguished : India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N.
criticised : India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N.
distinguished : Sudhir Chandra Nawn v. WTO
Second Gift Tax Officer v. D.H. Nazareth
Asstt. Commr. of Urban Land Tax v. Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd.
relied on : Venkateshwara Theatre v. State of A.P.
criticised : Buxa Dooars Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of W.B.
relied on : Twyford Tea Co. Ltd. v. State ofKerala
referred to : India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N.
relied on : Ganga Sugar Corpn. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Assn. v. Union of India
distinguished : Baijnath Kadio v. State of Bihar
Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P.
referred to : Buxa Dooars Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of W.B.
relied on : Union of India v. H.S. Dhillon
InternationalTourist Corpn. v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.