SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 196

A. M. AHMADI, S. P. BHARUCHA, SUJATA V. MANOHAR
New India Assurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, B.S.BANTHIA, MAN MOHAN SINGH, PRAMOD DAYAL, S.S.TIWARI

JUDGMENT

SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J. :—Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from a judgment and order dated 11th of February, 1994 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Misc. Appeal No.444 of 1991. The appellant before us is the New India Assurance Company Ltd. It had issued a comprehensive insurance policy in respect of a bus which was used for carrying passengers for hire and bearing Registration No. CIK-8108, owned by respondent No.4. This insurance policy was in force at the material time.

3. On 3rd of January, 1989, this bus, while it was being driven by respondent No.5, met with an accident. The deceased. Laxman Singh, who was sitting on the roof top of the bus driver, respondent No.5, hit a tree on account of the alleged rash and negligent driving of the said bus by respondent No. 5. He was admitted to hospital and died on 7-1-1989 on account of the injuries received in the accident. The legal heirs of Laxman Singh, who are respondents 1 to 3 before us, filed a claim for compensation amounting to Rs.7,81,000/- before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by its order dated 10-4-1991, awarded to respondents 1 to 3 compensation of Rs. 1,10,000/- together with in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top