SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 430

S.H.KAPADIA, S.N.VARIAVA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Calcutta Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Shrey Mercantile Private LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

Kapadia, J.—The short question which arises for determination in these civil appeals by grant of special leave by Calcutta Municipal Corporation is - whether the imposition for the process of change in the name of the owner in the assessment books of the corporation is in the nature of “a fee” or “tax”.

2. For the sake of convenience, we refer to the facts of Civil Appeal No. 5631 of 2000.

Premises bearing No. 9A, Jatindra Mohan Avenue, Calcutta - 700 006 belonged to Tapas Ghosh, Meenakshi Sinha and Gayatri Chandra. By several deeds of conveyance, they sold the said premises to M/s Shrey Mercantile (P) Ltd., M/s Drishti Mercantile (P) Ltd. and M/s KIC Resources Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the developers”). The building in the premises was very old and was in a dilapidated condition. The developers decided to construct a new building after demolishing the existing old structure. The developers submitted the building plan for sanction which the corporation refused to accept without the names of the developers being brought on record by way of mutation. On 21.3.1997, the developers applied for mutation by deletion of the names of the previous owners and substitution




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top