S.B.SINHA, S.H.KAPADIA
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Lucknow, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Chhata Sugar Co. LTD. – Respondent
S.H. Kapadia, J.
1. Doubting the correctness of a two-Judge Bench decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut v. Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills Ltd., 2001 (79) ECC 236 (SC) : 2001 (132) ELT 523 (SC), a Division Bench of this Court has referred the matter to a three-Judge Bench.
2. Since common question of law and fact arises in these appeals before us, the same are disposed of by this common judgment. However, for the sake of convenience we quote hereinbelow the facts in Civil Appeal No. 7488-7492 of 2001.
POINTS FOR DETERMINATION
3. It is convenient to set out, at the outset, the question involved in these appeals. That question is: whether administrative charge collected by the sugar factory for molasses sold from the buyers/allottees on behalf of the State Government in terms of Section 8(5) of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as "the U.P. Act") constituted a duty or impost in the nature of a tax and consequently not includible in the value as defined in terms of Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").
BACKGROUND FACTS
4. M/s. Chhata Sugar Company Ltd. Tehsil -- Chhata Distri
Neyveli Lignite Corpn.Ltd. v. CTO
CCE v. Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills Ltd.
B.S.E. Brokers Forum v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd.v. State of U.P.
Secy, to Govt.of Madras v. P.R.Srimmulu
Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti v. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd
Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P
City Corpn. of Calicut v. Thachambalath Sadasivan
Gasket Radiators (P) Ltd. v. ESI Corpn
Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd
Sreenivasa General Traders v. State of A.P
D.G. Gome and Co. (Agents) (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Hindustan Sugar Mills v. State of Rajasthan
Corpn. of Calcutta v. Liberty Cinema
Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel and Co. v. Union of India
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. State of Bombay
Referred to : Municipal Corpn., Amritsar v. Senior Supdt. of Post Offices
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.