RUMA PAL, ARUN KUMAR
Fairgrowth Investments LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Custodian – Respondent
JUDGMENT
RUMA PAL, J.
The question raised in this appeal is whether the Special Court constituted under The Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has power to condone the delay in filing a petition under Section 4(2) of the Act.
2. The object of the Act as stated in the Statement of Objects and Reasons is to deal with the situation created by large scale irregularities and malpractices in transactions in securities indulged in by some brokers in collusion with the employees of various banks and financial institutions. In particular, the Act seeks to ensure speedy recovery of the funds which have been diverted from banks and financial institutions to the individual accounts of brokers. The other objectives of the Act are to punish the guilty and to restore confidence in and maintain the basic integrity and credibility of the banks and financial institutions.
3. With these objectives in view the Act provides for the appointment of one or more Custodians to take action against any person involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities for the period after 1st April, 1991 upto and including 6t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.