SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1419

C. K. THAKKER, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, R. C. LAHOTI
Ramadhar Shrivas – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwandas – Respondent


JUDGMENT

C.K. Thakker, J.

Leave granted.

2. The present appeal is filed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Second Appeal No. 396 of 1998 by which the High Court confirmed the judgment and order passed by the Court of First Additional District Judge, Hoshangabad in Civil Regular Appeal No. 1-A of 1997, setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Court of First Civil Judge, Class II, Hoshangabad in Civil Suit No. 31-A of 1991.

3. To appreciate the controversy raised in this appeal, few relevant facts may be noted.

Ramadhar — appellant herein purchased a house bearing Municipal Ward No. 80, Sheet No. 34 situate at Mohalla Gwaltoli in Hoshangabad (M.P) by a registered sale-deed dated February 23, 1981 from one Hiralal Babulal for a consideration of Rs. 12,000/-. In the said deed it was expressly mentioned that Hiralal was the absolute owner of the property and he had full rights to sell the house. It was also stated that in future if any of his brothers or legal representatives would make any claim or raise any dispute or the purchaser would be dispossessed, the seller would pay compensation, damages and costs to the buyer. It w

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top