Back
C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KAROL
Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Vijayan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
1. The instant appeal, preferred by the original defendants, assails the judgment dated 27.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Kerala in A.S. No. 563 of 1999 whereby the appeal was dismissed and the preliminary decree passed by the Trial Court in O.S.631/1999 was affirmed.
MARUMAKKATHAYAM CUSTOMARY LAW - AN INTRODUCTION
2. The present appeal concerns the devolution of property by way of traditional Marumakkathayam law. Prior to delving into the legal niceties, an understanding of certain foundation concepts is necessary.
3. The Hindu community being a vast and diverse community is governed by different schools of personal laws. Apart from the dominant Mitakshara school of law, some communities among Hindus have their own system of personal law like the Marumakkathayam law, the Nambudiri law or the Aliyasantana law. In the issue at hand, parties are admittedly governed by the Marumakkathayam law. With respect to Marumakkathayam law, this Court has stated in Achuthan Nair v. Chinnamu Amma, 1965 SCC Online SC 303:
Under Marumakkathayam law, property obtained by a female and her children in partition retains its tharwad characteristics, ensuring rights for future descendants.
The court affirmed that property must be proven as tharavad to apply Marumakkathayam law, emphasizing community interest and unity of possession.
Properties can retain thavazhi character post-partition under the Madras Marumakkattayam Act, allowing joint holding despite per capita division.
The courts erred in determining property status, failing to recognize that once a joint family is established, the burden shifts to defendants to prove self-acquisition.
Under the Madras Marumakkathayam Act, a family member cannot alienate their share of family property without consent from other members, and such alienation is void unless validly supported.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of ancestral properties available for partition and the validity of gift settlement deeds.
A voluntary partition deed conferring rights on a female heir is valid despite prior restrictions under Hindu inheritance law, emphasizing that such arrangements, once consensually made, cannot be co....
The entitlement of children to jointly owned property under the Travancore Ezhava Act does not apply to property acquired through sale deeds, as confirmed by the court's findings.
Property purchased in wife's name from husband's funds pre-1956 is not Sthreedhanam but limited estate reverting to male heirs under Mitakshara law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
