SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KAROL, JJ.
Ramachandran and Others – Appellants
Versus
Vijayan and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2161 of 2012
Decided On : 22-11-2024
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
1. The instant appeal, preferred by the original defendants, assails the judgment dated 27.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Kerala in A.S. No. 563 of 1999 whereby the appeal was dismissed and the preliminary decree passed by the Trial Court in O.S.631/1999 was affirmed.
MARUMAKKATHAYAM CUSTOMARY LAW - AN INTRODUCTION
2. The present appeal concerns the devolution of property by way of traditional Marumakkathayam law. Prior to delving into the legal niceties, an understanding of certain foundation concepts is necessary.
3. The Hindu community being a vast and diverse community is governed by different schools of personal laws. Apart from the dominant Mitakshara school of law, some communities among Hindus have their own system of personal law like the Marumakkathayam law, the Nambudiri law or the Aliyasantana law. In the issue at hand, parties are admittedly governed by the Marumakkathayam law. With respect to Marumakkathayam law, this Court has stated in Achuthan Nair v. Chinnamu Amma, 1965 SCC Online SC 303:
4. Under this law, tharwad, thavazhi, karanavan are dominant concepts with respect to joint family. A tharwad is a Marumakkathayam joint family comprising of a female ancestor, her children, her daughter’s children, her daughter’s daughter’s children and all such other descendants, however remote, in the female line. By necessary exclusion, only the immediate male heir is part of the tharwad while his progeny are not. A person belongs to tharwad of his or her mother only.2 [K. Sreedhara Variar Marumakkathayam and Allied Systems of law in the Kerala State, First Edition, 1969] Membership of a tharwad is acquired by virtue of birth alone and on death, his interest devolves upon the other members of the tharwad. Members of a tharwad do not have a fixed interest but a fluctuating one, subject to change as per the number of members of the tharwad. Unlike coparcenary in Mitakshara law which extends to three generations succeeding the last male holder of the property, the Marumakkathayam system gives equal rights to all persons, however remote.
5. A tharwad is a larger body which holds within itself many branches. These branches are known as thavazhi which is a group of descendants in the female line of a female common ancestor. A thavazhi can own properties, separate and distinct from tharwad properties. In other words, a marumakkathayee woman alongwith her children and further descendants, how low-soever, in a female line constitute thavazhi.
The concepts discussed above would be best explained by way of illustrations as under:
ILLUSTRATION:
A is married to AH. They have three children- two daughters, AD1 and AD2, and a son, AS. All members shown above with the exception of AS1 form the tharwad of:
6. A karanavan is a manager of a joint family property. It is the oldest male member of the family. However, this customary position does not exclude a woman from managing the affairs of the tharwad or thavazhi if no male member is capable of taking up the required duties. Under Madras Marumakkattayam Act, 1932, it is defined as under:
Achuthan Nair v. Chinnamu Amma, 1965 SCC Online SC 303 [Para 3
Mary Cheriyan & Anr. v. Bhargavi Pillai Bhasura Devi & Anr. 1967 SCC Online Ker 68 [Para 19]
Srinivas Ram Kumar vs. Mahabir Prasad and Ors. 1951 SCC 136 [Para 55]
Sree Sree Iswar Gopal Jieu Thakur v. Pratapmal Bagaria
Addagada Raghavamma and Anr v. Addagada Chenchamma
Variety Emporium v. V.R.M. Mohd. Ibrahim Naina
Indira Kaur v. Sheo Lal Kapoor
Mithilesh Kumari & Anr. vs. Prem Behari Khare
Sardar Jogendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Guljar Singh vs. Dy. Director (Consolidation)
Sukhbiri Devi & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. 2022 SCC Online SC 1322 [Para 55]
Under Marumakkathayam law, property obtained by a female and her children in partition retains its tharwad characteristics, ensuring rights for future descendants.
The court affirmed that property must be proven as tharavad to apply Marumakkathayam law, emphasizing community interest and unity of possession.
Properties can retain thavazhi character post-partition under the Madras Marumakkattayam Act, allowing joint holding despite per capita division.
The courts erred in determining property status, failing to recognize that once a joint family is established, the burden shifts to defendants to prove self-acquisition.
Under the Madras Marumakkathayam Act, a family member cannot alienate their share of family property without consent from other members, and such alienation is void unless validly supported.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of ancestral properties available for partition and the validity of gift settlement deeds.
A voluntary partition deed conferring rights on a female heir is valid despite prior restrictions under Hindu inheritance law, emphasizing that such arrangements, once consensually made, cannot be co....
The entitlement of children to jointly owned property under the Travancore Ezhava Act does not apply to property acquired through sale deeds, as confirmed by the court's findings.
Property purchased in wife's name from husband's funds pre-1956 is not Sthreedhanam but limited estate reverting to male heirs under Mitakshara law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.