AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
Judgment :-
(SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Jamshedpur, taking cognizance of the offences alleged in the complaint.
3. Brief facts of the case need to be stated:
Appellant Kailashpati Singh is the complainant. On 23/7/2004, he filed a complaint in the Court of C.J.M, Jamshedpur being Complaint Case No.731 of 2004 against (1) Rajiv Ranjan Singh, Dy.S.P.-II, (2) Pradeep Kumar, S.I., (3) Omprakash, S.I., (4) Shyam Bihari Singh, constable and (5) Bharat Shukla, constable. In the complaint, the complainant alleged that his son Amit Pratap Singh @ Munna Singh (for convenience, “deceased Munna Singh”) was killed in a fake encounter by the accused named in the complaint including three others on 1/7/2004 at about 10.30 p.m. at Domohani, Sonari, Jamshedpur. According to the complainant, he received telephonic message on 2/7/2004 from one Sanjay Kumar of Jamshedpur that his son was killed in an encounter. This news was also published in the local newspapers of Jamshedpur. As per the newspaper report, along with the deceased, three others viz. Rajib Dubey, Babloo Prasad and Rambo were also killed. According to the complainant, he rushed to Jamshedpur with his eldest son
Matajog Dobey v. H.C. Bhari, [(1955) 2 SCR 925]
Nagraj v. State of Mysore [AIR 1964 SC 269]
Raj Kishor Roy v. Kamleshwar Pandey & Anr, [(2002) 6 SCC 543]
K. Satwant Singh v. The State of Punjab [1960 (2) SCR 89]
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. & Ors. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Anr. [(2005) 1 SCC 122]
Sankaran Moitra v. Sadhna Das & Anr. [(2006) 4 SCC 584]
Abdul Wahab Ansari v. State of Bihar & Anr. [(2000) 8 SCC 500]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.