SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1632

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT PASAYAT, S. H. KAPADIA
T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :

I.A. No. 2016

Heard learned Solicitor General and learned Amicus Curiae. They have been contemplating all formalities and terms and conditions. After discussing the learned Solicitor General and learned Amicus Curiae, for the time being we agree with the following terms and reference of CEC:

In supersession of all the previous orders regarding constitution and functioning of the Central Empowered Committee (hereinafter called “the Empowered Committee”) is constituted for the purpose of monitoring and ensuring compliance with the orders of this Court covering the subject-matter of forest and wildlife and related issues arising out of the said orders.

The Committee shall exercise the following powers and perform the following functions:

(i) to monitor the implementation of this Court’s orders and place reports of non-compliance before the Court and the Central Government for appropriate action;

(ii) to examine pending interlocutory applications in the said writ petitions (as may be referred to it by the Court) as well as the reports and affidavits filed by the States in response to the orders passed by the Hon’ble Court and place its recommendations before the Court for





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top