SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 36

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. ABDUL NAZEER, SANJIV KHANNA, JJ.
ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – APPELLANTS
VERSUS
GILLAPUKRI TEA COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ETC. – RESPONDENTS
Civil Appeal Nos. 251-252 of 2021 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.14266-14267 of 2019)
Decided On : 28-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Jayant Bhushan Nishant Das, Abhay Singh, Kaustubh Shukla, Ankita Agarwal, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Senthil Jagadeesan, Shuvodeep Roy, Rahul Mishra, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINTS
(1) Acquisition of land – Once award has been approved, compensation has been paid thereunder and possession of land has been handed over to Government, acquisition proceeding cannot be reopened.
(2) Once possession of acquired land is taken by State, land vests absolutely with State and title of landowner ceases

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 18Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Section 24(1)(a) – Acquisition of land – Reopening of land acquisition proceeding – Once award has been approved, compensation has been paid thereunder and possession of land has been handed over to Government, acquisition proceedings could not have been reopened, including by way of re-notification of already acquired land under Section 4 of L.A. Act by Government – Once possession is taken by State, land vests absolutely with State and title of landowner ceases – It would not have been possible for State Government to initiate acquisition proceedings in respect of already acquired land such as that of first respondent – Orders impugned set aside.(Paras 17, 18 and 19)

Facts of the case:

Assam Industrial Development Corporation Limited has filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order in Writ Appeal Nos. 219 & 220 of 2017 dated 14.03.2019 whereby Division Bench of the High Court of Guwahati has dismissed said appeals confirming the order of Single Judge in Review Petition Nos. 79 & 80 of 2016.

Findings of Court:

Plastic project for which the subject Land Acquisition was initiated has already been developed on the acquired land including boundary wall, entrance gate, laying of roads, drains and electrical distribution networks, electrical substation, industrial sheds and warehouses.

Result : Appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT :

S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Assam Industrial Development Corporation Limited has filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order in Writ Appeal Nos. 219 & 220 of 2017 dated 14.03.2019 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court of Guwahati has dismissed the said appeals confirming the order of the Learned Single Judge in Review Petition Nos. 79 & 80 of 2016.

3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of these appeals are as under.

4. In order to set up a plastic park, the Government of Assam decided to acquire a portion of the land belonging to the first respondent situated at Gillapukri Tea Estate, Village Gillapukri, Tinsukia, Assam. The Government of Assam, in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'L.A. Act') issued a notification dated 04.08.2008, which was published in the Assam Gazette on 08.08.2008, expressing its intention to acquire 1,166 biggas, 1 katha, 14 less as of land of the aforesaid Gillapukri Tea Estate. The proceedings being L.A Case No. 1 of 2008 were also initiated for the purpose of acquisition before the District Collector, Tinsukia and, for that purpose, declaration dated 17.06.2009 in terms of Section 6(1) of the L.A. Act was published in the Assam Gazette. The appellant was appointed as the nodal agency to deal with the acquisition proceedings vide appointment letter dated 24.06.2009.

5. The Deputy Commissioner and Collector, District Tinsukia, addressed a letter dated 30.01.2010 to the Principal Secretary to the Government of Assam, Revenue Department to seek approval of the award and the land acquisition estimate which were enclosed therewith in the prescribed Form No. 15 and Form No. 5 respectively. In response, the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Revenue Department, addressed a letter dated 05.03.2010 to the Deputy Commissioner whereby approval, as sought vide the aforesaid letter dated 30.01.2010, was granted. As will be seen in the following paragraphs, the controversy between the parties before us is whether this letter was approval of both the award and the estimate or only the estimate. Thereafter, the owner of the land, i.e. the first respondent herein, addressed a letter dated 05.05.2010 to the Commissioner seeking reference of the matter to the District Judge, Tinsukia, under Section 18 of the L.A. Act for reassessment of the compensation awarded to it. It is contended that other similar applications were also received from different families at different levels. It is further contended that in the letter dated 05.05.2010, the first respondent admitted that it had received a sum of Rs. 4.95 crores on 08.04.2010 by a crossed cheque immediately after the letter for approval dated 05.03.2010 was passed by the Commissioner. It is also contended that vide possession certificate dated 21.05.2010, possession was delivered to the Deputy Commissioner, and thereafter on 11.06.2010, possession of the land was handed over to the appellant by the Deputy Commissioner.

6. The first respondent has not disputed the issuance of the preliminary and final notification. However, it is contended that no award was approved pursuant to the letter dated 05.03.2010. It is the first respondent's case that vide this letter, only the land acquisition estimate was approved and not the award. This, in the first respondent's view, led to lapsing of the proceedings and initiation of fresh acquisition proceedings in 2012 which culminated in approval of the award for the first time on 04.01.2014. For this purpose, a fresh notification under Section 4 of the L.A. Act was published on 07.08.2012 and a declaration was also issued on 20.11.2012. Thereafter, the Commissioner issued a notice purportedly under Section 9 of the L.A. Act to the persons interested in the land to submit their objections and claims. On 04.01.2014, a fresh award was passed and the Deputy Secretary, Government of Assam, Revenue Department addressed a lett


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top