Back
VINEET SARAN, DINESH MAHESHWARI
SACHIN KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA – Respondent
ORDER
1. Permission to file Special Leave Petition(s) is granted.
2. Delay condoned.
3. Intervention/impleadment applications stand allowed.
4. Interlocutory Application No. 167927 of 2019 for deleting the proforma respondents No. 4 to 11 from the array of the parties stands allowed at the risk of the appellants.
Leave granted.
5. For the sake of convenience, we are taking up Civil Appeal No. 2691 of 2021 arising out of SLP(C) No.24806/2019 as lead matter and disposing of all the connected appeals by this common order.
6. This appeal is filed by non-parties in the Writ Petition who were, though directly affected, neither impleaded before the High Court as parties nor was there any prayer for issuance of such directions by which they are aggrieved.
7. Brief facts of this case are that respondents No. 1 and 2 had filed a Writ Petition before the High Court with the following prayers:-
(ii) to issue any other suitable writ, order or direction in the nature as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet the ends of justice
Writ Petition having been filed for a particular cause and with a particular prayer cannot be expanded to cover within its ambit all issues which may be of general or public importance without there ....
Compliance with Supreme Court directives under Articles 141 and 142 is mandatory, and the failure to enforce noise pollution regulations warrants initiation of contempt proceedings, regardless of the....
The main legal point established is that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India does not warrant interference with the High Court's order.
Right to be heard is fundamental before state action affecting property rights.
The court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi.
![Jaago Nehru Nagar Residents Welfare Association ] Having Its Office At Shop No.5, Alaknanda Chs Ltd. Vs The Commissioner Of Police ] Having Office At Crawford Market - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 157](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Bombay_1.png)
The use of loudspeakers for religious purposes must comply with noise pollution regulations, as no religion permits disturbance to public peace, reinforcing the right to a peaceful environment under ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
