Hero Moto Corp. Limited vs Vijay Kumar Munjal.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1384

J. K. MAHESHWARI, INDIRA BANERJEE
Hero Moto Corp. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Munjal. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Adv., Mr. B.B. Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv., Mr. Karan Luthra, Adv., Mr. Ankit Banati, Adv., Ms. Manvi Agarwal, Adv., Mr. E.C. Agarwala, Aor, For the Appellant, Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sanjeev Kapoor, Adv., Mr. Sahil Narang, Adv., Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Adv., Ms. Samriddhi Shukla, Adv., Mr. Pavan Bhushan, Adv., Mr. Jayavardhan Singh, Adv., M/S. Khaitan & Co., Aor, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. We find no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The High Court has clarified that all contentions of the parties are reserved. It is made clear that the contentions of the petitioner herein shall be considered uninfluenced by any observation(s) made by the High Court.

3. The special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document