Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose, JJ.
Ananya Tyagi & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Registrar General, Delhi High Court & Ors. – Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal © No(s). 10513 of 2022
Decided On : 08-06-2022
Article 136 - Jurisdiction of Supreme Court - Dismissal of Special Leave Petition
Fact of the Case:
The Supreme Court heard the petitioners and found no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition without interference with the High Court's order.
Issues: The issue was whether the Supreme Court should interfere with the High Court's order.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court found no reason to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the High Court's order.
Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed.
The main legal point established is that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India does not warrant interference with the High Court's order.
The court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling, affirming no substantial grounds for intervention under Article 136.
The court's discretion to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136(1) is influenced by the thorough consideration and negation of challenges by the lower court.
The court exercised its discretion to condone delay and dismissed the petition under Article 136 without interference, leaving law questions open.
Interlocutory orders are generally not interfered with by higher courts.
The court's decision clarified that certain observations made in the judgment regarding the applicability of specific sections and sanction shall not be binding for future stages.
Superior courts will not interfere with high court orders in the absence of a compelling legal justification, and frivolous petitions by the state or parties may invite the imposition of costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
