Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Telangana Public Service Commission, rep. by its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Paramesh Matta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ.
Mr. A.Sudarshan Reddy, learned Advocate General and Mr. S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appear for Mr. P.S.Rajasekhar, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Public Service Commission, appellant in W.A.Nos.1066, 1067, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078 and 1079 of 2025.
Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appears for Mr. Sriram Polali, learned counsel for the appellants in W.A.No.1086 of 2025 and respondent Nos.60, 61, 63, 64, 67 to 71, 74 to 79, 81, 82, 84, 86 to 125, 127 to 133, 135 to 137, 140 to 158 and 160 to 164 in W.A.No.1066 of 2025.
Mr. G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel appears for Mr. Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel for appellants in W.A.No.1470 of 2025 and respondents in W.A.Nos.1077 and 1080 of 2025.
Dr. K.Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel appears for the appellant in W.A.No.1054 of 2025 and respondent No.158 in W.A.No.1077 of 2025.
Mr. Poodattu Amarender, learned counsel appears for appellants in W.A.No.1080 of 2025 and respondent Nos.23 to 39 in W.A.No.1066 of 2025, respondent No.109 in W.A.No.1077 of 2025 and respondent No.24 in W.A.No.1086 of 2025.
Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, le
The court held that procedural discrepancies and allegations, without substantial evidence of bias or systemic failure, do not merit interference with the integrity of the examination process.
The court upheld the recruitment process's validity, asserting that low qualification rates alone do not imply arbitrariness, and candidates cannot challenge post-failure under doctrines of acquiesce....
Point of Law : It is well established law that scope of interference in an appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act against Interlocutory order, where rights of parties are not substantiall....
An examination can only be cancelled if there are systemic irregularities; isolated incidents do not justify re-examination if tainted candidates can be segregated from untainted ones.
Candidates cannot challenge recruitment processes post-results without demonstrating legal injury or material error affecting their outcomes.
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
