SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 543

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Manoj Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :A. Sirajudeen, Manjeet Chawla, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Manish Singhvi, Arpit Parkash, D. K. Devesh, Advocates

JUDGMENT : :

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.

Table of Contents

Preliminary

Relevant factual and background aspects

The Evidence

The Trial Court found the appellant guilty and awarded death sentence

Deceased aged 7 ½ years, mentally and physically challenged

Deceased last seen with the appellant

Discoveries on the information of appellant

Medical evidence

Report of FSL

Defence contentions rejected

Chain of circumstances complete

Death sentence by the Trial Court

High Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to the appellant

Rival Submissions

The scope and width of these appeals

Procedural questions relating to investigation and trial

Concurrent findings of fact: whether requiring interference?

Whether death sentence be maintained or substituted by any other sentence

Death sentence: Evolution of principles and norms

The theory of residual doubt

The crime and criminal tests: Aggravating and Mitigating circumstances of the present case

Conclusion

Prelimi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top