Pappu vs State of Uttar Pradesh - 2022 Supreme(SC) 118

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 118

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Pappu – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth, AOR Ms. Jemtiben AO, Adv. Mr. Vibhor Jain, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Jain, Adv. Ms. Vidhi Thaker, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vinod Diwakar, AAG Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR

Judgement Key Points

Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you would like me to analyze, and I will generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.

Table of Contents
Preliminary	2
Relevant factual and background aspects	6
Prosecution Evidence	9
Defence Version and Evidence	19
Trial Court found the appellant guilty and awarded death sentence	19
High Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to the appellant	24
Rival Submissions	28
The scope and width of these appeals	46
Concurrent findings of fact: whether requiring interference in these appeals	52
Whether death sentence be maintained or substituted by any other sentence	76
Conclusion	97

Preliminary

1. These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 06.10.2017 in Reference No. 13 of 2016 and Capital Case No. 6601 of 2016 whereby, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad has affirmed the judgment and order dated 07/08.12.2016 in Sessions Case No. 414 of 2015, as passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Kushinagar and while upholding the conviction of the appellant of offences punishable under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 118

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C. T. RAVIKUMARPappu – AppellantVersusState of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent

Cases Referred (38)

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Pappu – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent