SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 671

A. M. KHANWILKAR, ABHAY S. OKA, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Khasgi (Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore – Appellant
Versus
Vipin Dhanaitkar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Qurratulain, Brij Kishore, Shivani Rautela, Adarsh Pandey, M/S. Pba Legal, Ruby Singh Ahuja, Tahira Karanjawala, Aman Ahluwalia, Kritika Sachdeva, Varun Khanna, Lakshya Khanna, Sidhant Kumar Marwah, M/S. Karanjawala & Co., Arjun Garg, Ronak Karanpuria, Pulkit Tare, Saurabh Mishra, Mrinal Gopal Elker, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Utsav Trivedi, Abhinay, Manini Roy, Himanshu Sachdeva, Shivani Bhushan, Unnati Vijay, Pooran Chand Roy, Naheed Carrimjee, Sohan Kinkhabwala, P. S. Sudheer, Shruti Jose, Rishi Maheshwari, Anne Mathew, Bharat Sood, Prashant Bhushan, Neha Rathi, Alice Raj, Rahul Gupta, Umang Shankar, Mayank Kshirsagar, Anu Gupta, Beena Goyal, Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Akhileshwar Jha, Deepti Chopra, Amit Kumar, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Leave anted.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. These appeals take exception to the common judgment and order dated 5th October 2020 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore. By the said decision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court decided two Writ Appeals filed by the appellants in Civil Appeals arising out Special Leave Petition (C) 12133 of 2020 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 12241-42 of 2020. The Khasgi (Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore (for short, “the Khasgi Trust”) and its Trustee Shri S. C. Malhotra are the said appellants. The two writ appeals decided under the impugned judgment arise out of Writ Petition Nos. 11618 of 2012 and 5372 of 2010 filed by the Khasgi Trust. Writ Appeal No. 92 of 2014 arises out of Writ Petition No. 11618 of 2012. The Writ Appeal No. 135 of 2014 arises out of Writ Petition No.5372 of 2010. By the impugned judgment, a Public Interest Litigation filed by the first respondent-Shri Vipin Dhanaitkar in Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 12133 of 2020 was also decided.

3. The controversy revolves around the properties claimed by


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top