A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Karnataka Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
1. Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 1361 of 2021 and on consent taken up for hearing along with connected Civil Appeals. In all these Appeals a common question arises for consideration viz. “whether initiation of proceedings for acquisition of land for the purposes of the Karnataka Housing Board, invoking the power under Section 33(2) of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962, without the housing scheme being in existence or the housing scheme not having been sanctioned under Section 24(2) thereof, would render such acquisition proceedings void and non-est.” Certain allied questions may also call for consideration. We may hasten to state that we do not propose to dispose of the appeals on merits under this judgment and it would only resolve the stated common question and cognate issues. Nonetheless, if nothing survives for consideration in any appeal, upon answering the moot question and allied issues, then its fate would depend upon the nature of their answers.
2. The Karnataka Housing Board Act, (hereinafter for short “the KHB Act”) was enacted with an obj
Aflatoon v. Lt. Governor of Delhi
Arnold Rodricks v. State of Maharashtra
Munshi Singh v. Union of India
Offshore Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. (2011) 3 SCC 139 [Para 21]
Pt. Lila Ram v. Union of India
State of T.N. & others v. L. Krishnan’s & Others
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. v. Mohammed Yousef & Ors. AIR 1992 SC 1827 [Para 3]
The initiation of proceedings for acquisition of land for the purposes of the Karnataka Housing Board, invoking the power under Section 33(2) of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962, without the hou....
Court held that land acquisition proceedings are invalid if statutory requirements, such as preparing a housing scheme and addressing objections, are not fulfilled, leading to non-compliance with the....
Acquisition of land for housing requires strict adherence to statutory approval processes to ensure it serves a public purpose, failure to comply invalidates the acquisition.
Even though there is no period of limitation for filing petitions under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner should approach the Court without loss of time and if there is delay, t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the term 'local authority' under the State Land Acquisition Act and the impact of the repeal of the Act on ongoing acquisitio....
Initiation of land acquisition proceedings – For the purposes of sub-section (1) of Section 24 of 2013 Act, proceedings under L.A. Act shall be treated as initiated on publication of a notification u....
Acquisition of Land – Non passing of award – Lapse of proceedings - provisions of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, is not applicable to an acquisition proceeding initiated under the provisions of the K....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.