HEMANT GUPTA, VIKRAM NATH
Har Naraini Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Nath, J.
1. This civil appeal by the original writ petitioners before the High Court, assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 11.09.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2887 of 2008 whereby challenge was made to declare Section 50(a) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954,1[Hereinafter referred to as “1954 Act”] unconstitutional being ultra vires Articles 14, 15, 254 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
FACTS:
2. Genealogy (pedigree) relevant for the case is as follows :
| Shri Mukhtiar Singh (Died On 06.06.1997) | ||||||
| Son (1) Shri Mahinder Singh (Died in 1975) | Son (2) Shri Jagdish (Died in 1976) | Son (3) Ishwar (Died in 1985) | ||||
| 1. Kuldeep (Son) | 2. Kulbeer (Son) | Widow (Petitioner No.1) | Daughter (Petitioner No.2) | Son Jaidev (Respondent No.3) | Son Amit (Respondent No.4) | |
From the above pedigree it is clear that the appellants are the widow and daughter of Ishwar Singh whereas the contesting respondent nos. 3 and 4 are the sons of Ishwar Singh. The dispute relates to the agri
Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala
Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.
Babu Ram vs. Santokh Singh and others
Kesavananda Bharati (ii) Waman Rao and Ors. vs. Union of India
I.R. Coelho (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
M/s. Innoventive Industries Ltd. vs. ICICI Bank and Ors.
Parshanti Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation
Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. CCE
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.