SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1026

HEMANT GUPTA, VIKRAM NATH
M. S. P. L. Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
For the parties : Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. M. S. Ananth, Adv. Mr. Abhinabh Garg, Adv. Mr. Rohan Talwar, Adv. Mr. Shaswat Singh, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Udaya Holla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit S. Bhasme, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Mohini Kumari, Adv. Mr. Aman, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Joshi, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. V. Sarvanaraja, Adv. Mr. Anantha Narayana M.G., Adv. Mr. V. C. Shukla, Adv. Ms. Farah A., Adv. Dr. Prashant Pratap, Adv. Mr. Kumar Mitakshar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulia, Adv. Mr. Sushant Bajaj, Adv. Mr. M. L. Gopalkrishna, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gurukrishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, Adv. Mr. M. V. Mukunda, Adv. Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Ayush P. Shah, Adv. Ms. Rekha Dayal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Sirdyal Koomar Samy, Adv. Ms. Kamini Inamdar, Adv. Mr. V. Krishna Patil, Adv. Ms. Sandya Parvathi, Adv. Mr. S. K. Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. M. Giresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Adv. Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy, Adv. Mr. P. V. Dinesh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Raj Mishra, Adv. Mr. Bineesh K., Adv. Mr. Ashwini Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. A. V. S. Raju, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, Adv. Mr. K. P. Mavi, Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mohd. Apzal Ansari, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Mrs. Shubhangi Tuli, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Krishan Pal Mavi, AOR Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Ms. Anjana Chandrashekar, AOR Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Nath, J.

1. Leave granted in SLP(C) No. 23351/2012.

2. The State of Karnataka (Civil Appeal No. 4745-4747 of 2021), the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (Civil Appeal No. 4699-4719 of 2021), M/S MSPL Limited (Civil Appeal No. 4678 of 2021) and AARESS Iron & Steel Limited (Civil Appeal No. 4679-4698 of 2021) have jointly assailed the correctness of the judgment and order dated 22.03.2012 passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in a group of writ appeals filed by the land owners. By the said judgment, the Division Bench allowed the writ appeals, set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17.03.2009 and the writ petitions were allowed. The notifications under Sections 3 (1), 1(3) and 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 19661[In short “the 1966 Act”] were quashed.

3. Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No. 23351 of 2012 is filed by a land owner Syed Ahmed challenging the judgment dated 14.12.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Writ Appeal No. 6098 of 2009 whereby the writ appeal was dismissed and the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 23


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top