B. R. GAVAI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Lalankumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. Gavai, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 25th June 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, at Aurangabad, in Criminal Writ Petition No.288 of 2015, thereby dismissing the said criminal writ petition filed by the appellants herein and upholding the order of issuance of process dated 30th March 2009 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed (hereinafter referred to as “the learned CJM”) and the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Beed dated 25th November 2014 dismissing the Criminal Revision being Criminal Revision Petition No.115 of 2013 filed by the appellants thereagainst.
3. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under:
3.1 The Appellants are the Directors of M/s Cachet Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “CPPL”). CPPL was granted permission to manufacture ‘Hemfer Syrup’ which falls under Schedule C & C(1) to the Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Rules”).
3.2 On 30th August 2006, Sh. N.A. Yadav, the then Drugs Inspector, Food and Drugs Administration, Beed, Maharashtra, visited the premi
U.P. Pollution Control Board vs. Mohan Meakins Ltd. and others
Dinesh B. Patel and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
State of Haryana vs. Brij Lal Mittal and others
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Neeta Bhalla and another
Pooja Ravinder Devidasani vs. State of Maharashtra and another
K.K. Ahuja vs. V.K. Vora and another
Ashoke Mal Bafna vs. Upper India Steel Manufacturing and Engineering Company Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.