SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1061

S. ABDUL NAZEER, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Manoj Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Manish Sisodia – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the parties : Ms. Pinky Anand,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. Neeraj,Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj,Adv. Mr. Vijay Joshi,Adv. Mr. Kautilya Virat,Adv. Mr. Vedansh Anand,Adv. Mr. S.N.Verma,Adv. Ms. Smriti Singh,Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Raj, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat, AOR Mr. Bharat Gupta,Adv. Mr. Shourya Dasgupta,Adv. Ms. Hrishika Jain,Adv. Mr. Aman Naqvi,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Bhatnagar,Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Surender Kumar Gupta, AOR Mr. Neeraj, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal,Adv. Mr. Amit Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR

JUDGMENT :

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

Leave granted.

2. The order of summoning issued by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-I, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, in a criminal complaint of defamation filed by Respondent No.1 herein against six individuals, was challenged before the High Court unsuccessfully, by persons arrayed as Accused Nos.1 and 5 and hence both of them have come up with the above Criminal Appeals.

3. We have heard Shri R. Venkataramani and Ms. Pinky Anand, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel, as well as Shri Shadan Farasat, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1.

4. On 19.07.2019, Respondent No.1 herein filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C’) against six individuals, on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-I, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, alleging commission of the offences under Sections 499 and 500 read with Sections 34 and 35 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’). The case of Respondent No.1 in his complaint was, that he has been the Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi since


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top