SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1073

B. R. GAVAI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Raj Bala – Appellant
Versus
Rakeja Begam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR

JUDGMENT :

C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This instant Appeal arises out of the final judgment and order dated 24.08.2017 in F.A.O. No. 5948 of 2013 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh. The Appellants-claimants who are respectively the wife and children of the victim of a motor vehicle accident are dissatisfied with and aggrieved by the said judgment and order and they filed this Appeal seeking enhancement of the quantum of compensation.

3. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this Appeal are as follows:

    On 11.08.2009, the deceased-Sudesh Kumar was amongst the passengers in a bus bearing Registration No. JK-01Y-0432 of Jammu and Kashmir State Road Transport Corporation, driven by the deceased husband of the first Respondent, on its trip from Jammu to Srinagar. By about 13:20 hrs the bus fell into river Chenab and Shri Sudesh Kumar drowned in the river. The Appellants alleged that the accident had occurred due to the rash and negligent driving and the consequential loss of control of the bus. He was working as a Head Constable in the Railway P


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top