Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M. M. Sundresh, JJ.
The State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Param Bir Singh & Ors. – Respondents
Review Petition (Crl.) No. 134 of 2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 473 of 2022
Decided On : 20-07-2022
Review Petition - Criminal Appeal - The court rejected the application for oral hearing and dismissed the review petition, stating that the original order did not suffer from any apparent error warranting reconsideration.
Fact of the Case:
The court rejected the application for oral hearing and dismissed the review petition, stating that the original order did not suffer from any apparent error warranting reconsideration.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the original order did not suffer from any error apparent warranting its reconsideration and accordingly dismissed the review petition.
Issues: Application for oral hearing, Review petition
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lack of any apparent error in the original order that would warrant reconsideration.
Final Decision: The review petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
ORDER
1. Application seeking permission for oral hearing is rejected.
2. We have perused the Review Petition and record of the Criminal Appeal and are convinced that the order of which review has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent warranting its reconsideration.
3. Accordingly, the Review petition is dismissed.
4. Pending applications) stands disposed of accordingly.
The court's decision was based on the lack of any apparent error in the original order that would warrant reconsideration.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference in the previous judgment and dismissed the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the previous order.
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it only addresses apparent errors, without reevaluating case merits.
Points Of law : Grounds taken in the review petition have already been dealt with in the main.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the acquittal affirmed by the High Court.
Refusal to condone delay in review petition and its impact on the dismissal of the petition.
Points of law : Right to protest cannot be anytime and everywhere - There may be some spontaneous protests but in case of prolonged dissent or protest, there cannot be continued occupation of public ....
The court's decision to reject the Review Petition was based on the lack of justification for interference.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
