Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ.
Indra Deo Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. – Respondents
Review Petition (Crl.) No. 98 of 2022 in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 4551 of 2021
Decided On : 04-05-2022
Oral Hearing - Review Petition - N/A - The High Court affirmed the acquittal recorded by the Trial Court, and the Special Leave Petition arising therefrom was dismissed. The Review Petition was dismissed as no error apparent on record was found to justify interference.
Fact of the Case:
The acquittal recorded by the Trial Court was challenged by the complainant before the High Court, which affirmed the acquittal. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom was dismissed after hearing both sides.
Finding of the Court:
The Review Petition for Oral Hearing was rejected as no error apparent on record was found to justify interference.
Issues: Application for Oral Hearing in the Review Petition
Ratio Decidendi: No error apparent on record to justify interference
Final Decision: The Review Petition is dismissed.
ORDER
1. Application for Oral Hearing in the Review Petition is rejected.
2. The acquittal recorded by the Trial Court was challenged by the complainant - present review petitioner before the High Court. After considering the entire material on record the acquittal was affirmed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom, at the instance of the Review Petitioner, was dismissed after hearing both sides.
3. We have gone through the grounds taken in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
4. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the acquittal affirmed by the High Court.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference in the previous judgment and dismissed the Review Petition.
Points Of law : Grounds taken in the review petition have already been dealt with in the main.
The court's decision was based on the lack of any apparent error in the original order that would warrant reconsideration.
Courts generally defer to the decisions of lower courts unless there is a clear error on the record.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the previous order.
The court may condone delay in preferring a review petition if the grounds taken do not justify interference.
Affirmation of decree for specific performance based on evidence and merits of the case.
The court dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
