Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., S. Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ.
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ecgc) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Haris Marine Products – Respondent
Review Petition (C) No. 934 of 2022 in Civil Appeal Nos. 4139 of 2020
Decided On : 30-08-2022
Review Petition - Dismissal of Application for Oral Hearing
Fact of the Case:
The court dismissed the application seeking oral hearing in the Review Petition.
Finding of the Court:
After considering the facts and rival submissions, the court allowed the appeal in a previous judgment, which is now the subject matter of the instant Review Petition. The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference and dismissed the Review Petition.
Issues: Application for oral hearing in the Review Petition, grounds raised in the Review Petition
Ratio Decidendi: The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference in the previous judgment and dismissed the Review Petition.
Final Decision: The Review Petition seeking oral hearing was dismissed by the court.
ORDER
1. Application seeking oral hearing in the Review Petition is dismissed.
2. After considering the facts on record and the rival submissions, by its detailed judgment dated 25.04.2022, this Court allowed the appeal, which judgment is now subject matter of the instant Review Petition.
3. We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition but do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
4. This Review Petition is therefore dismissed.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference in the previous judgment and dismissed the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the previous order.
Points Of law : Grounds taken in the review petition have already been dealt with in the main.
The court's decision was based on the lack of any apparent error in the original order that would warrant reconsideration.
The court dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
The court's decision to reject the Review Petition was based on the lack of justification for interference.
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it only addresses apparent errors, without reevaluating case merits.
The grounds raised in a Review Petition must establish an error apparent on record to justify interference.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the acquittal affirmed by the High Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
