SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 318

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. SHAH, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
Sunita Kumari @ Gudiya – Appellants
VERSUS
The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. – RESPONDENTS
Criminal Appeal No. 25 OF 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.9899/2019)
Decided On : 04-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Avinash Sharma, AOR
For the Respondent: Ms. Srishti Singh, AOR, Mr. Abhishek Rai, Adv., Mr. Pratap Shanker, Adv., Mr. Gyanant Singh, Adv., Mr. Sarthak Shanker, Adv., Mr. Kunal Kohli, Adv., Mr. Swetank Shantanu, AOR

Once a charge sheet is filed after finding a prima facie case, it cannot be considered as a bogus prosecution under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Headnote:Dowry Prohibition Act - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498-A/506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Section 3/4

Fact of the Case:

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the accused based on the wife's illness and pending divorce petition. The charge sheet had been filed after finding a prima facie case.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court erred in quashing the proceedings as the reasons given were not relevant. The prosecution was not bogus merely because of the wife's illness and pending divorce petition.

Issues:

Whether the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi:

The court held that once a charge sheet is filed after finding a prima facie case, it cannot be considered as a bogus prosecution.

Final Decision:

The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court were set aside, and the criminal proceedings against the respondents/original accused were ordered to be restored. The present appeal was allowed accordingly.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 09-05-2019 passed by the High Court of High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad in Application under Section 482 No. 14850/2017 by which the High Court has allowed the said application preferred by the original accused/private respondents herein and has quashed the criminal proceedings for the offences under Section 498-A/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the original complainant has preferred the present appeal.

3. At the outset, it is required to be noted that at the time when the High Court passed the impugned order and quashed the criminal proceedings, after investigation, the charge sheet was already filed against the accused having found the prima facie case against the accused.

4. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that the High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings by observing that as the original complainant/wife was suffering from the disease AIDS and that a divorce petition was also stated to be pending between the parties, the allegations of demand of dowry are inherently improbable. Merely because the wife was suffering from the disease AIDS and/or divorce petition was pending, it cannot be said that the allegations of demand of dowry were highly/inherently improbable and the said proceedings can be said to be bogus proceedings. Therefore, the reasoning given by the High Court while quashing the criminal proceedings are not germane and the High Court while quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) has seriously erred and exceeded in its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Once the charge sheet was filed after the investigation having been found prima facie case, it cannot be said that the prosecution was bogus. Under the circumstances, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court quashing the criminal proceedings is unsustainable.

5. In view of the above and for the reasons stated hereinabove and without further expressing anything on merits of the trial and the allegations, we set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court and the criminal proceedings against the respondents/original accused are hereby ordered to be restored. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is set aside.

6. The present Appeal is allowed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top