Back
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, M. M. SUNDRESH
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge orders under electricity act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. regulatory framework for power procurement (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. jurisdiction of state commission over ppa (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. dynamic nature of appc and rec pricing (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. applicability of regulatory amendments to existing contracts (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 6. requirements for proving coercion in contracts (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 7. court's conclusion on appeals (Para 72) |
JUDGMENT :
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
1. The current civil appeals1 [Civil Appeals Nos. 3480 and 3481 of 2020] under Section 125 of the ELECTRICITY ACT , 2003, (hereafter, “the Act”) challenge orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereafter “APTEL”) dated 06.12.2018 (“first impugned order”)2 [in Appeal No. 209/2015] and order dated 24.07.2020 (“second impugned order”)3 [in Review Petition No. 03/2019]. The APTEL had, by those orders, rejected the appeals preferred by the present appellant, and the review petition, as well. Resultantly, the order of the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commissio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
