Back
HIMA KOHLI, RAJESH BINDAL
E. S. I. Corporation, Rep. by the Regional Director – Appellant
Versus
Endocrinology and Immunology Lab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
1. Order dated 21.08.2008 passed by the High Court of Kerala has been challenged by the Corporation1 [The Employees State Insurance Corporation] by which the appeal2 [Ins. App. No.4 of 2008(A)] filed by the respondent was allowed. It was held that the provisions of the Act3 [The Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter ‘the Act’)] will be applicable to the respondent establishment w.e.f. 06.09.2007 and not from 22.11.2002.4 [Wrongly typed in the impugned order as 24.11.2002]
2. Briefly stated, as per the facts available on record, the respondent establishment is a pathological laboratory. Inspection of the premises of the respondent was carried out by the Inspector on 01.04.1999. Having found that there were 19 employees working in the establishment, a show cause notice was issued to the respondent. The respondent establishment challenged coverage of the establishment by filing an application under Sections 75 and 77 of the Act before the Employees’ Insurance Court. The Court vide order dated 19.04.2007, passed in I.C. No. 13/2003 declared tha
Coverage of establishments under Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 can be expanded by State Notification.
The interpretation of statutory notifications and the principle of giving full effect to every word in the notification were central to the judgment.
The Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 applies to educational institutions, affirming their classification as 'establishments' to provide social security benefits to employees, regardless of the ins....
Educational institutions qualify as 'establishments' under the Employees State Insurance Act, ensuring employee social security benefits, regardless of their non-commercial status.
The functional integrality of the establishments justified their clubbing and coverage under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
The voluntary contribution under the EPF Act does not automatically encompass an establishment under the ESI Act, and the Act cannot be extended to establishments without a notification from the appr....
The definition of 'shop' encompasses various commercial activities, not limited to direct sales of goods.
The court established that the presence of more than 10 employees, including Hamals, qualifies the establishment under the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
