SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 789

M. M. SUNDRESH, J. B. PARDIWALA
Mukesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Jayesh Gaurav, Advocate, Ms. Nandini Rai, Advocate, Ms. Diksha Ojha, Advocate and Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

This appeal, by special leave, is at the instance of a convict accused and is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.02.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 1246 of 2011 by which the High Court dismissed the appeal and thereby affirmed the judgment and order of conviction dated 08.04.2011 and the order on sentence of life imprisonment dated 27.04.2011 resply passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-II (North West), Rohini, Delhi in the Sessions Case No. 998 of 2009 holding the appellant convict herein guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 392, 394 and 397 resply read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, IPC).

CASE OF THE PROSECUTION

2. The appellant convict along with three other co-accused was put to trial in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-II (North West), Rohini, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 394, 397, 307, 302, 411 read with Section 34 of the IPC. On 16.08.2


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top