VIKRAM NATH, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Sabbir (Dead) Through Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Anjuman (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. – Respondent
ORDER :
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Both the original parties to the agreement to sell being dead, are now represented through their Legal Representatives (LRs). Appellants are LRs of the defendant whereas the Respondents are the LRs of the plaintiff.
4. The present appeal is directed against the Final Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2018 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”) passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”) in Second Appeal No.1574 of 1984 by which the second appeal filed by the respondents was allowed; judgment of the First Appellate Court was set aside, and; judgment of the Trial Court was affirmed and restored.
THE FACTUAL PRISM:
5. An Agreement to Sell (hereinafter referred to as “ATS”) was executed in favour of the respondents by the appellants on 31.07.1975. The ATS envisioned that the appellants had to apply for permission to sell the property within eight days and upon permission being received, the same was to be intimated to the respondents and the Sale Deed was to be executed within 15 days from receipt of such intimation by the respondents.
Ghewarchand v Mahendra Singh, (2018) 10 SCC 588
Basawaraj v Land Acquisition Officer, (2013) 14 SCC 81
Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn., (2005) 7 SCC 510
Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh, (1973) 2 SCC 705: AIR 1973 SC 2537
Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Jalgaon Medium Project, (2008) 17 SCC 448: (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 907
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.