SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant before this Court has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Sessions Trial No. 85 of 1996 for offences under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and has been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302/34 and rigorous imprisonment for 7 years under Section 307/34 with default stipulations. The conviction and sentence of the appellant was upheld in appeal by the High Court, in its order dated 07.05.2019.
3. There were four accused in the case, which were Gaya Prasad Mishra, Gulab Chandra, Pawan Kumar and Babadeen. The accused Babadeen passed away during the trial and his case stood abated and the remaining three were convicted for the offences as stated above. The said conviction has been upheld by the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad (Lucknow Bench). Meanwhile, as far as Gaya Prasad Mishra and Gulab Chandra are concerned, who are the father and brother of the present appellant respectively, they were released prematurely after remaining in jail for more than 19 years, under the remission policy of the State. Consequently, they have not filed any petition
Pratap Singh vs. State of Jharkhand and Another
Satya Deo alias Bhoorey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Hariram vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
Shah Nawaz vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Vinod Katara vs. State of U.P. 2022 SCC Online SC 1204 – Relied. [Para 30]
Ram Suresh Singh vs. Prabhat Singh
Jyoti Prakash Rai vs. State of Bihar
Mukarrab and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.