SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1951

N. V. RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
Abdul Majeed Lone – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Danish Majiddar, Adv., Mr. Bhat Shafi, Adv., Mr. Anant Vikram Singh, Adv., Mr. Abhay Anand Jena, AOR
For the Respondent: Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR, Mr. Ashish Madaan, Adv., Mr. Amritesh Raj, Adv., Ms. Ananya Sahu, Adv.

Table of Content
1. exemptions granted for filing documents. (Para 1 , 2)
2. consideration of incarceration duration for bail. (Para 3)
3. petitioner released on bail with conditions. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER :

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir and perused the material available on record, including the counter affidavit filed by the UT.

4. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to be released on bail, subject to such terms & conditions which the concerned Trial Court shall deem fit and find appropriate to impose upon him.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top