C. T. RAVIKUMAR, RAJESH BINDAL
xxxx – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Bindal, J.
1. The appellant in the present case is aggrieved of the order,1[Order dated 01.08.2022] passed by the High Court,2[High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur] whereby a petition,3[M.CR.C. No. 15992 of 2021] filed by him under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR,4[FIR No. 52 dated 11.12.2020 registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, Dist. Satna, (M.P.) under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC] was dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the FIR in the case in hand, which was got registered by respondent No.2/complainant is nothing else but an abuse of process of law. The complainant was a married lady having a grown up daughter of 15 years of age living with her parents. Claiming that in the same house, the appellant was having physical relations with her with the consent of her parents and daughter will be hard to believe that too when she was already married. There could not be any question of promise to marry given by the appellant to her at that stage. There are large discrepancies in the complaint made to the police on the basis of which the FIR was registered if considered in the light of the statement which the complainant got recorded u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.