SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 443

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR, JJ.
Deependra Yadav and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 5604 of 2024, Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 5817, 23514, 27620 of 2023
Decided On : 01-05-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R Bala Subramanyam, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Nangia, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aman Varma, AOR Mr. Harsh Parashar, AOR Mr. Chanakya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Saurabh Mishra, A.A.G. Mr. Baijnath Patel, Adv. Mr. Atmaram N. S. Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Dr. Harsh Pathak, Adv. Ms. Shaveta Mahajan, AOR Mr. Mohit Choubey, Adv. Mr. Santosh Rebello, Adv. Ms. Samridhi S. Jain, AOR Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr. Ambuj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Kiran Pandey, Adv. Ms. Mamta Rani, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Reservation in Appointment – Candidates belonging to any of vertical reservation categories would be entitled to be selected in ‘open category’ and if such candidates belonging to reservation categories are entitled to be selected on the basis of their own merit, their selection cannot be counted against quota reserved for categories of vertical reservation that they belong to.

Headnote:

Service Law – Reservation in Appointment – Candidates belonging to any of vertical reservation categories would be entitled to be selected in ‘open category’ and if such candidates belonging to reservation categories are entitled to be selected on the basis of their own merit, their selection cannot be counted against quota reserved for categories of vertical reservation that they belong to – Reservations, both vertical and horizontal, are methods of ensuring representation in public services and these are not to be seen as rigid ‘slots’ where a candidate’s merit which otherwise entitles him to be shown in open general category, is foreclosed – ‘Open category’ is open to all and only condition for a candidate to be shown in it is merit, regardless of whether reservation benefit of either type was available to him or her – In case in hand, a transparent process which was completely above board, was adopted to bring all candidates onto an even platform so as to finalize list of candidates eligible to be interviewed – This was done by applying a formula uniformly to marks secured by all candidates who appeared in two main examinations so that their marks would become comparable and enable preparation of a unified marks list – Decisions made by expert bodies including Public Service Commissions, should not be lightly interfered with unless instances of arbitrary and malafide exercise of power are made out. [Madhya Pradesh State Service Examination Rules, 2015 – Rule 4 – Section 4(4) of Madhya Pradesh Lok Seva (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994 – Section 4(4)](Paras 26, 27 and 31)

Facts of the case:

One lapse on the part of the State is all it took to generate this litigation, impacting multitudes of job aspirants in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The lapse was the amendment of an existing service rule on 17.02.2020 which was recalled thereafter on 20.12.2021, restoring the rule to its original position, but in the interregnum that amended rule was applied to an ongoing recruitment process. This prompted several challenges before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur resulting in a spate of orders and directions leading up to these cases.

Findings of Court:

Impugned judgment dated 25.01.2023 passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1706 of 2022 does not brook interference on any ground, be it on facts or in law.

Result : Civil Appeal dismissed.

1. Leave granted only in SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023.

2. One lapse on the part of the State is all it took to generate this litigation, impacting multitudes of job aspirants in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The lapse was the amendment of an existing service rule on 17.02.2020 which was recalled thereafter on 20.12.2021, restoring the rule to its original position, but in the interregnum that amended rule was applied to an ongoing recruitment process. This prompted several challenges before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur resulting in a spate of orders and directions leading up to these cases before us.

3. The Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC) issued an advertisement on 14.11.2019 proposing to select candidates for 571 posts in the State services in accordance with the Madhya Pradesh State Service Examination Rules, 2015 (for brevity, ‘the Rules of 2015’). The Rules of 2015 were framed in exercise of power under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The Madhya Pradesh State Service Examination-2019 was scheduled to be held by the MPPSC for filling up these posts, by conducting a preliminary examination followed by the main examination and interviews. The preliminary examination took place on 12.01.2020. The total number of candidates who registered for the preliminary examination stood at 3,64,877 but only 3,18,130 of them actually appeared for the examination. At that stage, on 17.02.2020, Rule 4 of the Rules of 2015 was amended by the State of Madhya Pradesh. Rule 4, as it stood prior to the amendment and to the extent relevant for the purposes of this adjudication, read as under:

    “Rule 4. Mode of preparation of select list:

(1)(a)(i) On the basis of marks obtained in Preliminary Examination, candidates numbering 15 times the vacancies as advertised category wise will be declared successful for Main examination subject to the condition that candidates have scored minimum passing marks as may be specified by the Commission. In addition to this, all the other candidates who get marks equal to “Cut Off Marks” will also be declared successful for the main examination.

(ii) Firstly, a list of Candidates of unreserved category shall be prepared. This list will include the candidates selected on the basis of the common merit from Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes, who have not taken any advantage/relaxation given to the concerned category.

(iii) Secondly, separate lists of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes will be prepared.

...............

(d) A common list of successful candidates shall be prepared after the preparation of all four lists, and examination result will be declared thereafter. This list will be roll number wise.”

4. It is clear from a bare reading of the above Rule 4 that the result of the preliminary examination was to be declared by clubbing meritorious reservation category candidates, who had not availed any reservation benefit, with the meritorious unreserved category candidates and not with their respective reservation category candidates. While so, the amendment effected on 17.02.2020 brought about a sea change in this methodology. To the extent relevant, the amended Rule 4 of the Rules of 2015 read thus:

    “4. Mode of preparation of select list:

(1)(a)(I) On the basis of marks obtained in Preliminary Examination - category wise candidates numbering 15 times of the vacancies as advertised will be declared successful for Main examination subject to the condition that candidates have scored minimum passing marks as may be specified by the Commission. In addition to this, all the other candidates who get marks equal to “Cut Off Marks” will also be declared successful for the main examination.

(II) Separate Lists of Candidates applied in Unreserved, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Economically Weaker Section shall be prepared. Reservation shall be given to Women and Ex-Servicemen in all categories as pe

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top