VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE
Dharmendra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Agra Development Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Vikram Nath, J.) :
1. Civil Appeals 2809-2810 of 2024, by the appellant filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 19861[CPA, 1986], read with Order XXIV of the Supreme Court Rules, assail the correctness of the final judgment and order dated 15.09.2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2[NCDRC], in CC No.600/2020 as also the order dated 30th October, 2023 passed on the Review Application No.335/2023. By the aforesaid orders, the NCDRC allowed the CC No.600/2020 partly to the extent that it directed refund of the entire amount deposited by the Complainant (appellant) (except non-judicial stamp paper worth Rs.3,99,100/- deposited on 15.02.2014) along with interest @9% p.a. from the date of the complaint i.e. 11.07.2020 till the date of refund within a period of two months from the date of the order.
2. Further, Civil Appeal No. 6344 of 2024 has been filed by the Agra Development Authority3[ADA], assailing the correctness of the same judgment of the NCDRC dated 15.09.2023 partly allowing the complaint.
3. The appellant -Dharmendra Sharma had applied for allotment and purchase of an apartment (residential flat) in the category of Super
Debashis Sinha & Ors. vs. R.N.R. Enterprise
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.
Treaty Construction vs. Ruby Tower Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.
Ghaziabad Development Authority vs. Balbir Singh
Lucknow Development Authority vs. M.K.Gupta
Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shri Hari Gokhale & Ors.
(1) Apartment Buyer’s Agreement – Possession offered without requisite completion certificate is illegal and purchaser cannot be compelled to take possession in such circumstances.(2) Pecuniary juris....
Consumer service agreements may not curtail statutory jurisdiction of consumer forums, which can award compensation beyond stipulated contractual terms if deemed unfair.
The ruling affirms that delivery of possession must align with statutory obligations, including the provision of necessary occupancy certificates, which are essential for validating consumer rights i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the period for delivery of possession commences from the date the Fire NOC is granted, and the developer's failure to provide promised ameniti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.