C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR
Poonam Ankur Pawar – Appellant
Versus
Ankur Ashokbhai Pawar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of divorce petition under cpc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. impact of non-participation in court proceedings. (Para 3) |
| 3. conclusion on the transfer of case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
1. This petition is filed under Section 25 of the C.P.C. seeking transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition No. 01/2023 filed under Section 9 of the Hindu marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights, titled “ Ankur Ashokbhai Pawar vs. Smt. Poonam Ankur Pawar ” pending before the Court of Ld. District Judge of Dadra & Nagar haveli at Silvassa to the Court of Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
2. Despite service of notice, the sole respondent has chosen not to appear and contest the matter.
3. Taking note of Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, we are of the view that it cannot be said that non-participation in a proceeding of a restitution of conjugal rights, of the party who seeks for transfer of such proceeding is absolutely impactless. In fact, it has civil consequences as is evident from the aforesaid provision. In such circumstances and taking into account the distance of the court where the case sought to be transferred is pending and the place where the
The court has the power to set aside orders and invoke Article 142 of the Constitution of India to ensure fair trials and protect the rights of the parties involved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.