SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, JJ.
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Delhi International Airport Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 3098-3099 of 2023 Civil Appeal Nos. 1798-1799 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No. 1806 of 2021 With Civil Appeal Nos. 10668-10670 of 2024 With Civil Appeal Nos. 3697-3698 of 2022 With Civil Appeal No. 8217 of 2023 With Civil Appeal No. 7767 of 2023 With Civil Appeal Nos. 10691-10692 of 2024 With Civil Appeal No. 393 of 2024 With Civil Appeal No. 10678 of 2024 And With Civil Appeal No. 10659 of 2024
Decided On : 18-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI.
| INDEX | |
| A. | Statutory Background |
| B. | Submissions |
| C. | Issues |
| D. | Analysis |
| i. Authorities exercising ‘adjudicatory functions’ cannot defend their orders in appeal | |
| ii. Necessary and proper parties in regulatory proceedings | |
| iii. The test of quasi-judicial functions: A misnomer | |
| iv. The test for determining an ‘adjudicatory function’: Exploring Sitaram Sugar | |
| v. Whether tariff determination is an adjudicatory function: PTC and GRIDCO | |
| vi. Tariff determination for aeronautical services by AERA is a regulatory function | |
| vii. Interpretation of Sections 18 and 31 of the AERA Act | |
| E. | Conclusion |
1. Airports Economic Regulatory Authority1 [“AERA”] has instituted proceedings under Section 31 of the Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act 20082 [“AERA Act”] for challenging the judgments of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal.3 [“TDSAT”] TDSAT is the Appellate Tribunal for the purposes of the AERA Act and it has the competence to hear appeals against orders of AERA. The respondents have raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the appeals on the ground that AERA, which is a quasi-judicial body, cannot file an appeal against the judgment of TDSAT. This judgment disposes of the preliminary issue of whether the appeals filed by AERA under Section 31 of the AERA Act are maintainable.
A. Statutory Background
2. The long title of the AERA Act provides that it is an Act to establish AERA and to a) regulate tariff and other charges for aeronautical services rendered at airports; (b) monitor performance standards of airports and (c) for other incidental and connected matters.4 [“An Act to provide for the establishment of an Airports Economic Regulatory Authority to regulate tariff and other charges for the aeronautical services rendered at airports and to monitor performance standards of airports and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto”] The Act applies to all airports where air transport services are operated or are intended to be operated, other than airports in the control of the Armed Forces or paramilitary forces of the Union.5 [AERA Act; Section 1(3)(a)]
The Act also applies to all private and leased airports6 [AERA Act; Section 1(3)(b)], all civil enclaves7 [AERA Act; Section 1(3)(c)] and all major airports.8 [AERA Act; Section 1(3)(d)]
3. Section 3 of the AERA Act stipulates that the Central Government must, by a notification, establish AERA within three months from the date of commencement of the Act. By a notification dated 12 May 2009, the Central Government established AERA. Section 13 of the AERA Act prescribes the functions of AERA. AERA must perform the following functions in respect of major airports:
b. Determine the amount of development fees [Section 13(1)(b)].
c. Determine the passengers service fee levied under Rule 88 of the Aircraft Rules 1937 notified under the Aircraft Act 1934 [Section 13(1)(c)].
d. Monitor the performance standards relating to quality, continuity and reliability of service as specified by the Central Government or any other authority authorised by it [Section 13(1)(d)].
e. Call for information necessary to determine the tariff [Section 13(1)(e)].
f. Perform such other functions relating to tariff which may be entrusted to it by the Central Government or which may be necessary to carry out the provisions of the Act [Section 13(1)(f)].
4. Section 13(1)(a) also prescribes the factors which AERA must take into consideration to “determine” tariff. The following are the seven factors provided by the provision:
b. The service provided, its quality and other relevant factors.
c. The cost of improving efficiency.
d. Economic and viable operation of major airports.
e. Revenue received from services other
Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (1992) 2 SCC 524 [Para 32]
PTC India v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, (2010) 4 SCC 603 [Para 13
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission
Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd v. Union of India
GRIDCO v. Western Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Limited
Savitri Devi v. District Jugde, Gorakhpur
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Syed Ahmad Ishaque
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Additional Member Board of Revenue
Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji v. State of Gujarat
Syed Yakoob v. KS Radhakrishnan
Bar Council of Maharashtra v. MV Dabholkar
Competition Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India
Vidus Impex & Traders Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 8 SCC 384 [Para 32]
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. v. Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. (2013) 5 SCC 397 [Para 32]
Express Newspaper Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Province of Bombay v. Khushaldas S Advani
Shivji Nathubhai v. Union of India
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Union of India v. Cynamide India Ltd.
The Airports Economic Regulatory Authority can appeal against TDSAT orders as it has a vital interest in tariff determinations, establishing its role as a necessary party in such appeals.
The CERC possesses both regulatory and adjudicatory powers under the Electricity Act, allowing it to impose compensation for delays while retaining the framework under which such determinations are m....
The court emphasized that tariff revisions under contractual agreements should be mutually agreed upon and prohibited unilateral changes by authorities without consent.
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation and enforcement of Regulation 17 of the CERC Tariff Regulations fall within the adjudicatory powers of the Central Electric....
Regulatory functions performed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission do not constitute a taxable supply under GST, as they are not conducted in the course of business.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.