SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1045

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Rajeev Suri – Appellant
Versus
Archaeological Survey of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Shikhil Shiv Suri, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Madhu Suri, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Suri, Adv. Ms. Wamika Chadha, Adv. Mr. Vibhor Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Ishita Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Jha, Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. S.D. Sanjay, A.S.G. Mr. Aranya Sahay, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kohli, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. B. L. N. Shivani, Adv. Ms. Satvika Thakur, Adv. Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Adv. Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR Mr. Md Ghulam Akbar, Adv. Mr. Jeemon Raju K, Adv. Ms. Shruti Shashi, Adv. Mr. Sushant Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. D Girish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jay Nirupam, Adv. Mr. Pranav Giri, Adv. Mr. Ekansh Sisodia, Adv. Ms. A. M. Harsavardhini, Adv. Mr. Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Prasenjeet Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria, Adv.

ORDER

This petition was filed challenging the order of the Delhi High Court dated 20.02.2019, which had dismissed the petitioner’s writ petition. The core of the dispute is regarding a medieval period monument called ‘Gumti of Shaikh Ali’, which is situated in Defence Colony, New Delhi and from where, admittedly, the office of Defence Colony Welfare Association (in short, ‘DCWA’) is presently operates.

2. The petitioner has sought the following prayers from this Court :-

    “(a) That… this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant special leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition No. 4099/2018.

    (b) Such other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, including the counsel appearing for Archeological Survey of India [in short, ‘ASI’] and other relevant parties. On 27.08.2024, the following order was passed by this Court :-

    “Heard the petitioner in-person and learned counsel for the parties.

    IA No.78852/2019

    2. Exemption from filing Certified Copy of the Impugned Judgment1is grant

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top