Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Committee Of Management Jami Masjid Sambhal Ahmed Marg Kot Sambhal – Appellant
Versus
Hari Shankar Jain – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to the revision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments presented by the revisionist. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. court's observations on the arguments. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
| 4. legal principles derived from applicable laws. (Para 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122) |
| 5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127) |
JUDGMENT :
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.
1. The present revision filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter called as the ‘ CPC ’) questions the order dated 19.11.2024 passed on application paper no. 3C filed by plaintiff respondent nos. 1 to 8 for grant of leave to institute the suit before expiry of p
A court may grant leave to institute a suit without notice under Section 80(2) CPC if urgent relief is necessary, and the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for local investigation is valid and ....
The Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not bar the determination of the religious character of a place of worship, which must be established through evidence in court.
The court affirmed the priority of public interest in preserving historical monuments over private construction rights, ruling unauthorized constructions after necessary prohibitions as invalid.
The court ruled that the plaints disclose a valid cause of action, are not barred by limitation, and the religious character of the property requires evidence to be determined at trial.
Amendments to pleadings in civil suits should be allowed if they facilitate proper adjudication and do not introduce a new cause of action.
The repair works and installation of doors in a protected area constituted 'operation of like nature' and material alteration of the building, attracting the provisions of Section 19 of the Act of 19....
The court affirmed that new constructions within prohibited areas near protected monuments violate statutory provisions, emphasizing the need for preservation of historical sites over individual cons....
The declaration of the Christian Cemetery as a Heritage site was illegal due to non-compliance with statutory procedures under the Assam Ancient Monuments and Records Act, 1959.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
