SUJOY PAUL, PRANAY VERMA
VATASH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
ORDER SUJOY PAUL, J. – These petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution take exception to the Resolution No. 69 dated 27-7-2021 whereby the petitioner’s bid were rejected. The consequential Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) No. 160 dated 10-8-2021 is also called in question whereby fresh bids for the same shops were invited by respondent Indore Development Authority (IDA). On the joint request of the parties the matters were analogously heard and decided by this common order.
2. Facts are taken from W. P. No. 18012/2021.
3. By issuing NIT No. 226 dated 26-9-2019, NIT No. 274 dated 14-11-2019 and NIT No. 97 dated 27-6-2020 the bids were invited for the shops situated at RCM 13 which includes shops No. 1 and 2 which are subject-matter of present lis and RCM No. 14 situated at Scheme No. 140, Anandvan, Phase II, Indore. Since no bids were received by IDA, a fresh NIT No. 220 dated 18-12-2020 (Annexure P/2) was issued. The petitioner participated in the aforesaid NIT through e-tendering and submitted his bid for shops No. 1 and 2 jointly admeasuring 415.92 sq.mtr. The base pr
Ram and Shyam Company vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India
Siemens Public Communication Pvt. Ltd. and another vs. Union of India and ors.
Pathan Mohammed Suleman Rehmatkhan vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Dutta Associates (P) Ltd. vs. Indo Merchantiles (P) Ltd.
Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. vs. Metcalfe and Hodgkinson (P) Ltd.
Dhananjaya Reddy vs. State of Karnataka
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs. Anjum M. H. Ghaswala
Nelson Motis vs. Union of India and another
Haryana Financial Corporation and another vs. Jagdamba Oil Mills and another
Satyanjay Tripathi and anr. vs. Banarsi Devi
Kalinga Mining Corpn. vs. Union of India
Meerut Development Authority vs. Assn. of Management Studies
Caretel Infotech Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
State of Jharkhand vs. CWESOMA Consortium
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka
P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep vs. State of Kerala and another
Heinz India (P) Ltd. vs. State of U. P.
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.