Rachna Agarwal vs Arvind Kumar Goyal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 1294

DIPANKAR DATTA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Rachna Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kumar Goyal – Respondent

Advocates:
.Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Savita Devi, Adv., Ms. Swati Jindal, AOR, Ms. Savita Devi, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Adv., Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR, Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Adv., Ms. Bela Bansal, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv., Mr. Rahul Rathi, Adv., Mr. Pratik R. Bombarde, AOR

ORDER :

Transfer Petition (Crl.) No.667/2024

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. We are not inclined to entertain the transfer petition, which seeks transfer of Criminal Revision bearing No. Crl. Rev. P/1/2024 titled “Rachna Agarwal Vs. Arvind Kumar Goyal & Ors.” from the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok to the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, primarily on the ground that the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok is seized of a criminal revision petition and the petitioner’s attendance in course of hearing of the same is not necessary. If her presence is at all necessary, she may join through the virtual mode.

3. The transfer petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Transfer Petition (C) Diary No. 47938/2023

5. Delay condoned.

6. Read the office report dated 05th December, 2024.

7. The marriage between the petitioner, Rachna Agarwal, and the respondent, Arvind Kumar Goyal, was solemnized on 26th January, 2016. On 23rd January, 2018, a boy was born from the wedlock. However, the parties have since drifted apart owing to differences having arisen between them.

8. The respondent has instituted proceedings under Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document