Back
ANIRUDDHA BOSE, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment based on contractual terms and lack of regularization (Para 3) |
| 2. no legal right to regularization from prolonged contract work (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final dismissal of the petition and related applications (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER :
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-State.
The court ruled that long-serving contractual employees cannot be denied regularization based solely on contractual labels, emphasizing fair treatment under constitutional principles.
Since there are no sanctioned posts on which any of these petitioners were appointed as irregular appointments, no such directions are warranted.
Temporary employees appointed via constitutional procedures are entitled to regularization, highlighting the need for compliance with recruitment mandates to ensure fairness and uphold employee right....
Employees appointed in temporary units on contractual basis are not entitled to absorption or regularization, as their initial appointment was not on permanent sanctioned posts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
