Moushumi Poddar vs Neeraj Kumar - 2024 Supreme(SC) 1319

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 1319

VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Moushumi Poddar – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Kumar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Harshit, Adv., Ms. Neha Rai, Adv., Mr. Mukesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Madhup Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Sharma, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, AOR, Mr. Harshit, Adv., Ms. Neha Rai, Adv., Mr. Mukesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Madhup Kumar Tiwari, Adv.

ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. We have perused the settlement agreement dated 12th December, 2024 executed between the parties.

3. In terms of the settlement, a Demand Draft for Rs. 31,00,000/-(Rupees Thirty One Lakhs only) drawn in favour of the wife and also a diamond ring as full and final settlement of all claims have been handed over by the learned counsel for the respondent-husband to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner- wife, who is duly authorised to receive the same. The wife is connected through video conferencing and has requested that her lawyer may receive the same.

4. An application (IA No. 294677/2024) has been filed by the learned counsel for the husband praying for dissolution of marriage and quashing/terminating all other proceedings between the parties by enforcing this Court’s power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties prayed for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent by enforcing this Court’s power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and for quashing of all the proceedings pending between the parties/their family members.

6. Consi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document