SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI AND AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.
Ashok Anandrao And Another – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Etc. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 214 of 2025 [@ SLP (Criminal) No. 718 of 2025 @ DIARY NO(S). 23859 of 2022] with Criminal Appeal No. 216 of 2025 [@ SLP(Criminal) No. 720 of 2025 @ DIARY NO(S). 43066/2023]
Decided on : 15-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement agreement and payments confirmed. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. application for divorce based on irretrievable breakdown. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court's exercise of article 142 powers. (Para 6) |
| 4. marriage dissolution and quashing of pending proceedings. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. conclusion and disposal of the appeal. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. In pursuance to the order dated 03.09.2024 a Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- was already given to the respondent No.2/wife (Ashwini) by the appellant(s). Today a Demand Draft for a sum of Rs. 8,00,000/- has also been handed over by the learned counsel for the appellant No.2 to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2/wife.
3. The appellant No.2/Ashish Anandrao has filed an application for grant of decree of divorce on the terms and conditions as have been settled between them, as per the Settlement Agreement dated 06.04.2024.
4. As per the said settlement agreement, an amount of Rs.12,00,000/- was required to be paid by the appellant No.2/Ashish Anandrao to the respondent No.2/wife towards full and final settlement of all her dues. The said amount has already been paid by the appellant No.2 to the respondent No.2/wife.
5. The relationship between the appellant No.2/Ashish Anandrao and respondent No.2/wife is irretrievably broken down. Both the parties are of young age and therefore it will be in the interest of justice that they be permitted to live their lives peacefully and independently.
6. In that view of the matter, this is a fit case wherein this Court should exercise its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.
7. The marriage between the appellant No.2/Ashish Anandrao and the respondent No.2 (Ashiwni)/wife is directed to be dissolved on the terms and conditions stated in the Settlement Agreement dated 06.04.2024. The respective statements made by the appellants and the respondent No.2/wife therein are treated as an undertaking to this Court.
8. The proceedings between the parties arising out of FIR No.506/2019 registered with Police Station Sarangpur, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh which culminated into R.C.T. No.237/2021 pending before Hon'ble 7-II Civil Judge Class-II, P.S. Sarangpur, District Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh shall stand quashed and set aside.
9. Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of.
10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
The Supreme Court upheld the principle that mutual consent agreements in divorce cases can effectively facilitate dissolution when parties' relationship is irretrievably broken, promoting justice and....
The court exercised its power under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent and quash all related legal proceedings.
The court upheld the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Article 142, confirming that the parties reached an amicable settlement through mediation and met the conditions of Section 13(B) ....
The court dissolved the marriage by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, acknowledging the Settlement Agreement between the parties.
The court recognized the validity of a mutual divorce settlement under Article 142, ensuring no further claims arise between the parties post-agreement.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.