Palak vs Yogesh - 2025 Supreme(SC) 92

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 92

DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN
Palak – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Petitioner-in-person
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv., Mr. Prateek Mehta, Adv., Ms. Megha Mehta, Adv., Mr. Arun Singh, Adv., Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Adv., Mr. Tarun Bagga, Adv., Mr. Vikas, Adv., M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR

ORDER :

1. Palak [petitioner in T.P.(C) No.2800/2024] and Yogesh Jain [petitioner in T.P.(Crl.) No.1077/2024] tied the marital knot on 26th June, 2023. No child is born to them from such wedlock. As time passed by, due to temperamental differences, the spouses drifted apart resulting in initiation of cases/proceedings by and between them.

2. During pendency of these transfer petitions, we thought that a mediated settlement could be explored. The spouses agreed but, unfortunately, mediation failed to yield any positive result. However, the spouses have since realized that pendency of proceedings and uncertainties related thereto would only add to their agony; hence, they have agreed to terminate their differences by having the marital knot severed upon terms and conditions, which have been recorded in a memorandum of settlement. Such memorandum is part of a joint application under Article 142 of the Constitution of India (I.A. No. 297472/2024) filed by them, wherein it has been prayed as follows: -

b. quash/dismiss all the legal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document