SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 322

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S OKA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.
Sukhdev Singh - Appellant
Versus
Sukhbir Kaur - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2536 of 2019, with Civil Appeal No. 5726 Of 2019
Decided on : 12-02-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, AOR Mrs. Mridul Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Akash Karanwal, Adv. Mr. Shubham Chandel, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. Neeleshwar Pavani, Adv. Ms. Shaurya Mishra, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINTS
(1) Alimony – A spouse whose marriage has been declared void under Section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is entitled to seek permanent alimony or maintenance from other spouse by invoking Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
(2) Entitlement under Section 25 does not depend on whether bigamous marriage is moral or immoral – Remedy under Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is completely different from remedy under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.

Headnote:

(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Sections 24 and 25 – Grant of alimony – Void marriage – A spouse whose marriage has been declared void under Section 11 of 1955 Act is entitled to seek permanent alimony or maintenance from other spouse by invoking Section 25 of 1955 Act – Whether such a relief of permanent alimony can be granted or not always depends on facts of each case and conduct of parties – Grant of relief under Section 25 is always discretionary – Even if a Court comes to a prima facie conclusion that marriage between parties is void or voidable, pending final disposal of proceeding under 1955 Act, Court is not precluded from granting maintenance pendente lite provided conditions mentioned in Section 24 are satisfied – While deciding prayer for interim relief under Section 24, Court will always take into consideration conduct of party seeking relief as grant of relief under Section 24 is always discretionary – Even if a Court comes to a prima facie conclusion that marriage between parties is void or voidable, pending final disposal of proceeding under 1955 Act, Court is not precluded from granting maintenance pendente lite provided conditions mentioned in Section 24 are satisfied – While deciding prayer for interim relief under Section 24, Court will always take into consideration conduct of party seeking relief, as grant of relief under Section 24 is always discretionary. (Para 29)

(B) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Sections 24 and 25 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 125 – Grant of alimony – Void marriage – While enacting Section 25(1), Legislature has made no distinction between a decree of divorce and a decree declaring marriage as a nullity – It will not be possible to exclude a decree of nullity under Section 11 from purview of Section 25(1) of 1955 Act – If a decree of nullity is covered by Section 25, issue of whether a bigamous marriage is immoral is irrelevant – Entitlement under Section 25 does not depend on whether bigamous marriage is moral or immoral – Remedy under Section 25 of 1955 Act is completely different from remedy under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. (Paras 18, 20 and 22)

Facts of the case:

Applicability of Sections 24 and 25 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, whether alimony can be granted where marriage has been declared void.

Findings of Court:

Grant of relief under Section 24 is discretionary as the Section uses the word ‘may’. While deciding prayer for interim relief under Section 24, Court will always consider the conduct of party seeking the relief. It provides for issuing a direction to pay a reasonable amount.

Result : Reference answered.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - A spouse whose marriage has been declared void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is entitled to seek permanent alimony or maintenance from the other spouse by invoking Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (!) . - The grant of permanent alimony or maintenance under Section 25 is discretionary and depends on the facts of each case and the conduct of the parties (!) . - Even if a court finds a marriage to be void or voidable, it is not precluded from granting maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, provided the conditions of Section 24 are met (!) . - The grant of interim relief under Section 24 is discretionary, and the court must consider the conduct of the party seeking relief (!) . - The remedy under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is distinct from the remedy under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. (!) . - The entitlement under Section 25 does not depend on whether a bigamous marriage is moral or immoral (!) . - The term "any decree" in Section 25(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, includes a decree declaring a marriage as a nullity under Section 11 (!) . - The decisions in Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav and Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya are not applicable to Section 25 as they dealt with proceedings under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. (!) (!) . - The use of terms like "illegitimate wife" or "faithful mistress" to describe a spouse in a void marriage is inappropriate and violates fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution (!) .None

What is the entitlement of a spouse whose marriage has been declared void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to claim permanent alimony and maintenance under Section 25 of the same Act?

What is the entitlement of a spouse to seek maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, in a petition seeking a declaration that the marriage is void under Section 11?


JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

ISSUE REFERRED

1. The reference to a Bench of the three Hon’ble Judges has been made by the order dated 22nd August 2024 of this Court, which reads thus:

    “Learned counsel appearing for the parties state at the Bar that these matters need to be considered by a Three Judge Bench combination as there are conflicting views on the applicability of Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, whether alimony can be granted where marriage has been declared void.

    Following are the judgments in favour of granting alimony :-

Sl. No.

CITATION

TITLED

1.

(1993) 3 SCC 406

Chand Dhawan Vs. Jawaharlal Dhawan

2.

(2005) 2 SCC 33

Rameshchandra Rampratapji Daga Vs. Rameshwari Rameshchandra Daga

Following are the judgments against granting alimony :-

Sl. No.

CITATION

TITLED

1.

(1988) 1 SCC 530

Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav Vs. Anantrao Shivram Adhav & Another

2.

AIR 1999 AP 19

Abbayolla Reddy Vs. Padmamma

3.

(2003) 1 HLR 100

Navdeep Kaur Vs. Dilraj Singh

4.

(2004) AIR Bom. 283(FB)

Bhausaheb @ Sandhu S/o Raguji Magar Vs. Leelabai W/o Bhausaheb Magar

5.

(2005) 3 SCC 636

Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya Vs. State of Gujarat & Others

    Accordingly, let the papers be placed before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India for passing appropriate orders.”

RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF LAW

2. Before we refer to the submissions made across the Bar, it will be necessary to briefly refer to the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the 1955 Act’). Section 5 deals with the conditions for a Hindu marriage, which reads thus:

    “5. Conditions for a Hindu marriage.—A marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:—

    (i) neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage;

    (ii) at the time of the marriage, neither party—

    (a) is incapable of giving a valid consent to it in consequence of unsoundness of

    mind; or

    (b) though capable of giving a valid consent, has been suffering from mental disorder of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and the procreation of children; or

    (c) has been subject to recurrent attacks of insanity;

    (iii) the bridegroom has completed the age of twenty-one years and the bride, the age of eighteen years at the time of the marriage;

    (iv) the parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;

    (v) the parties are not sapindas of each other, unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;” (emphasis added)

3. The 1955 Act deals with void marriages and voidable marriages. Section 11, which deals with void marriages, reads thus:

    “11. Void marriages. — Any marriage solemnised after the commencement of this Act shall be null and void and may, on a petition presented by either party thereto against the other party, be so declared by a decree of nullity if it contravenes any one of the conditions specified in clauses (i), (iv) and (v) of section 5.”

4. The 1955 Act contemplates the filing of the following categories of petitions for grant of different reliefs:

    a. A petition seeking relief of restitution of conjugal rights in accordance with Section 9;

    b. A petition seeking relief of judicial separation in accordance with Section 10;

    c. A petition seeking a declaration that a marriage is void in accordance with Section 11;

    d. A petition for annulment of a marriage on the ground that it is voidable in accordance with Section 12;

    e. A petition seeking a divorce in accordance with Section 13; and

    f. A petition seeking divorce by mutual consent in accordance with Section 13B.

5. We are called upon to interpret Sections 24 and 25 of the 1955 Act, which read thus:

    “24. Maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings.—Where in any proceeding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top