Dileepbhai Nanubhai Sanghani vs State of Gujarat

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 413

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Dileepbhai Nanubhai Sanghani – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Mukul Rohtagi Sen, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Akhil Mittal, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Ruparalia, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Adv. Mr. S N Kalra, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Kalra, AOR Mr. Sabir Kachi, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Iqbal Syed, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mohammad Aslam, AOR Mr. Saroj Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Aniq Kadri, Adv. Mr. Amaan Syed, Adv. Mr. Prithu Parimal, Adv. Mr. Vishrut Bhandari, Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR Ms. Abhipsa Mohanty, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant was a Minister in the Government of the State of Gujarat, who after his resignation was proceeded with under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.¹ [For brevity ‘the Act’] The allegation was that with intent to obtain illegal gratification, fishing contracts in the reservoirs vested with the State were allotted without following the policy of the Government; mandating tender proceedings. The appellant is before us challenging the Order of the High Court refusing to quash the criminal proceeding initiated against him. The complainant, first respondent herein, inter-alia engaged in trading of fish, was desirous of obtaining fishing contracts by participating in the tender process, approached the High Court challenging the illegal grant by way of allocation, without any tender process. The High Court cancelled the grants and the State was directed to proceed to make such grants through a proper tender process. The complainant asserted that the tender process culminated in grants to successful bidders which clearly generated more consideration for the State; indicating the attempt of accused Nos. 1 to 7 to obtain illega